The ruling has raised considerations about human rights, non secular freedom and Pakistan’s worldwide standing. The nation was ranked among the many prime 10 nations the place Christians face probably the most excessive persecution within the Open Doors 2026 World Watch List.
CeCe Heil, senior counsel and worldwide authorized director of the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), informed Fox News Digital that the case towards brothers Amoon and Qaisar Ayub started in 2014.
Qaisar was arrested after a WordPress web site displayed the brothers’ contact data and revealed content material deemed insulting to Prophet Muhammad. Amoon was arrested the next 12 months.
According to Heil, regardless of 12 years of authorized proceedings, the Pakistani authorized system has not offered proof proving that both brother was affiliated with the web site in query.
The ACLJ, by way of its Pakistani counterpart, the Organisation for Legal Aid (OLA), started representing Amoon shortly after his arrest in 2015. Both brothers had been sentenced to dying in 2018.
Their appeals had been dismissed by the Lahore High Court in 2022. Following additional proceedings on the Supreme Court in 2025, Qaisar additionally sought illustration from the OLA.
After years of authorized arguments and 13 postponed hearings, the Supreme Court, in a verdict delivered on October 7, acquitted Amoon after roughly 10 years in jail however upheld Qaisar’s conviction and dying sentence.
Heil stated blasphemy hearings in Pakistan are more and more going down in a threatening ambiance, with mobs allegedly gathering in courtrooms to strain judges.
She recounted an incident through which a gaggle filmed themselves threatening to kill a decide if he didn’t implement a dying sentence by hanging.
Heil additionally cited a video displaying a outstanding lawyer concerned in a number of blasphemy instances celebrating the authorized proceedings that culminated in Qaisar’s sentencing.
A translation of the outline accompanying the video learn: “There is only one punishment for one who insults the Prophet: The death penalty for Qaisar Ayub.”
According to Heil, the Supreme Court’s resolution may have implications for different folks going through blasphemy expenses in Pakistan, together with at the least three OLA purchasers.
Among them is Shahzad Masih, who was 16 when he was accused of blasphemy in 2017 and sentenced to dying in 2022. His attraction hearings have repeatedly been postponed since 2022.
Another Christian, Intizar Masih, is awaiting trial over an allegedly blasphemous submit he reportedly shared on WhatsApp in 2023.
Ahsan Masih was accused of posting blasphemous content material on TikTok in 2023 and sentenced to dying the next 12 months. His attraction hearings have additionally been postponed.
The OLA plans to file a overview petition on the Supreme Court, difficult the dearth of proof towards Qaisar. The organisation additionally intends to attraction on to the Pakistani authorities for help, together with a presidential pardon.
Heil expressed concern over what she described as a contradiction between Pakistan’s efforts to current itself as a extra tolerant negotiator within the ongoing Iran battle and its dealing with of non secular freedom at residence.
The Pakistani Embassy in Washington, DC, didn’t reply to Fox News Digital’s questions on the opportunity of a presidential pardon for Qaisar, the potential worldwide implications of the ruling or the challenges of securing justice in courtrooms the place judges face threats from onlookers.
A US State Department spokesperson, nevertheless, informed the publication that Washington was involved about non secular freedom in Pakistan and globally, including that the difficulty was usually mentioned with the Pakistani authorities.
Heil additionally disclosed that the ACLJ had requested Morris Tidball-Binz, the United Nations particular rapporteur on extrajudicial, abstract or arbitrary executions, to intervene on Qaisar’s behalf.
Although Tidball-Binz didn’t reply to questions in regards to the Supreme Court’s ruling, the UN Human Rights Council secretariat offered a letter written by him and different UN officers to the Pakistani authorities in September 2025.
The letter expressed grave concern over the dying sentences imposed on Shahzad Masih and the Ayub brothers, citing an obvious lack of conclusive proof and questioning whether or not the alleged offences met the brink of “most serious crimes” required for the imposition of the dying penalty beneath worldwide human rights requirements.
The officers warned that, if the allegations had been established, the instances may violate the lads’s rights to life, liberty, a good listening to, freedom of faith and expression, and equal safety beneath the legislation.
In its response earlier this 12 months, the Pakistani authorities maintained that such issues fell throughout the judicial area beneath the nation’s Constitution and that the manager was constitutionally prohibited from intervening in particular person instances.
Heil stated that though Amoon had been spared the dying penalty, efforts had been persevering with to guard him from potential reprisals.
We’ve received the sting. Get real-time stories, breaking scoops, and unique angles delivered straight to your telephone. Don’t accept stale information. Join LEADERSHIP NEWS on WhatsApp for twenty-four/7 updates →
